iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Hisilicon Kirin9000 vs Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×Hisilicon Kirin9000×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed3.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartQ1 2021Q1 2021
# of Samples4486
Single Thread Rating24902230
CPU Mark50835435
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 20th of May 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Hisilicon Kirin9000
5,083
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250
5,435
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 20th of May 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Hisilicon Kirin9000
2,490
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250
2,230

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Hisilicon Kirin9000Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.