iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Hisilicon Kirin980 vs Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7250

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×Hisilicon Kirin980×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7250+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2,600.0 GHz2.4 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartNANA
# of Samples873
Cross-Platform Rating99997145
Single Thread Rating17111628
CPU Mark38163051
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 10th of April 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Hisilicon Kirin980
3,816
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7250
3,051
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 10th of April 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Hisilicon Kirin980
1,711
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7250
1,628

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Hisilicon Kirin980Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7250
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.