iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Hisilicon Kirin990 vs Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×Hisilicon Kirin990×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2,861.0 GHz2.8 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartNANA
# of Samples21273
Cross-Platform Rating1117512743
Single Thread Rating19112249
CPU Mark43895034
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 17th of October 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Hisilicon Kirin990
4,389
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250
5,034
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 17th of October 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Hisilicon Kirin990
1,911
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250
2,249

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Hisilicon Kirin990Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.