iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Manta vs Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8017

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×Manta×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8017+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed1.7 GHz1.4 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores2 (Threads: 2)4 (Threads: 4)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartQ1 2021Q1 2021
# of Samples314
Single Thread Rating4263305
CPU Mark356473
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.
3 - Single thread rating may be higher than the overall rating, thread performance is just one component of the CPU Mark.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 25th of June 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Manta
356
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8017
473
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 25th of June 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Manta
426
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8017
305

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
MantaQualcomm Technologies, Inc APQ8017
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.