iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM636 vs Samsung Exynos 9610

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM636×Samsung Exynos 9610+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed1.8 GHz2,314.0 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartNANA
# of Samples12776
Cross-Platform Rating45474814
Single Thread Rating806932
CPU Mark18371756
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 25th of October 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM636
1,837
Samsung Exynos 9610
1,756
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 25th of October 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM636
806
Samsung Exynos 9610
932

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM636Samsung Exynos 9610
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.