iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM665 vs Samsung Exynos 8890

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.


×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM665×Samsung Exynos 8890+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2.0 GHz2,600.0 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartQ1 2021Q1 2021
# of Samples102174
Single Thread Rating898927
CPU Mark22122330
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 24th of May 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM665
 2,212
Samsung Exynos 8890
 2,330
PassMark Software © 2008-2022
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 24th of May 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM665
 898
Samsung Exynos 8890
 927
PassMark Software © 2008-2022

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM665Samsung Exynos 8890
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.