iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225 vs Samsung Exynos 9825

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.


×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225×Samsung Exynos 9825+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2.2 GHz2,730.0 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartNANA
# of Samples1534
Cross-Platform Rating702311290
Single Thread Rating17291665
CPU Mark30703343
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 10th of April 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225
 3,070
Samsung Exynos 9825
 3,343
PassMark Software © 2008-2021
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 10th of April 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225
 1,729
Samsung Exynos 9825
 1,665
PassMark Software © 2008-2021

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225Samsung Exynos 9825
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.