iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225 vs Samsung Exynos 9825

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.


×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225×Samsung Exynos 9825+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2.2 GHz2,730.0 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartQ1 2021Q1 2021
# of Samples57233
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group)1756(0.0%)1614(-8.1%)
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group)3295(-7.0%)3542(0.0%)
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 5th of July 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225
 3,295
Samsung Exynos 9825
 3,542
PassMark Software © 2008-2022
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 5th of July 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225
 1,756
Samsung Exynos 9825
 1,614
PassMark Software © 2008-2022

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM7225Samsung Exynos 9825
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.