iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250 vs Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250×Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartNANA
# of Samples28116
Cross-Platform Rating1275013258
Single Thread Rating22511685
CPU Mark50384405
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 26th of October 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250
5,038
Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350
4,405
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 26th of October 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250
2,251
Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350
1,685

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.