iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250_AC vs Odin based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250_AC×Odin based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed3.2 GHz3.0 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartQ4 2021Q3 2021
# of Samples3328
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group)2605(0.0%)1720(-34.0%)
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group)6173(-3.4%)6390(0.0%)
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 1st of July 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250_AC
6,173
Odin based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350
6,390
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 1st of July 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250_AC
2,605
Odin based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350
1,720

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8250_ACOdin based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.