iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM632

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.

×Samsung Exynos 9611×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM632+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2.3 GHz1.8 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartQ1 2021Q1 2021
# of Samples2171
Single Thread Rating1007746
CPU Mark19081818
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 25th of May 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Samsung Exynos 9611
1,908
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM632
1,818
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 25th of May 2022 - Higher results represent better performance
Samsung Exynos 9611
1,007
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM632
746

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Samsung Exynos 9611Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM632
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.