iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LITO

The values for the CPUs below are determined from thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and are updated daily.


×Samsung Exynos 9825×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LITO+ ADD
PriceSearch OnlineSearch Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2,730.0 GHz2.4 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
Max TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
First Seen on ChartNANA
# of Samples3483
Cross-Platform Rating112907069
Single Thread Rating16651554
CPU Mark33432913
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 10th of April 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Samsung Exynos 9825
 3,343
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LITO
 2,913
PassMark Software © 2008-2021
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 10th of April 2021 - Higher results represent better performance
Samsung Exynos 9825
 1,665
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LITO
 1,554
PassMark Software © 2008-2021

Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per dayAverage CPU Utilization (0-100%)1Power cost, $ per kWh2
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Samsung Exynos 9825Qualcomm Technologies, Inc LITO
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.