iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Samsung "Exynos 9610"

Price and performance details for the Samsung "Exynos 9610" can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

Samsung "Exynos 9610"

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.2 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: Samsung "Exynos 9610"

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2024

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 2278

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
3168

Single Thread Rating: 1012
Samples: 2*
*Margin for error: High

CPU Test Suite Average Results for Samsung "Exynos 9610"

Integer Math20,774 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math5,339 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers7 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting9,901 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption3,032 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression48,824 KBytes/Sec
Physics184 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions885 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread1,012 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 1st of June 2024.

CPU Mark Distribution for Samsung "Exynos 9610"

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 26th of May 2024


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 26th of May 2024.

Search for Samsung "Exynos 9610"
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 1st of June 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 25,422
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,181
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,454
Apple A15 Bionic
 9,900
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,545
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,677
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,685
Intel N100
 5,551
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,375
Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,168
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 1,576
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 1st of June 2024 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
 43.54
Intel N100
 43.37
Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A15 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 1st of June 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,700
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 3,635
Apple A15 Bionic
 3,606
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,396
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,224
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,321
Intel N100
 1,959
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,908
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,770
Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 1,012
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 824
Last 2 Baselines for Samsung "Exynos 9610"
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8076390 - Jan 11 2024
3168
BL8076389 - Jan 11 2024
3168
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for Samsung "Exynos 9610"
As of 1st of June 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,168
QTI SM4450 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,915 (+23.6%)
Qualcomm SDM670 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,221 (+1.7%)
Mediatek MT8789V/CT vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,946 (+24.6%)
QTI SM7125 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,867 (+22.1%)
QTI SM7150 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,766 (+18.9%)
Mediatek MT6785 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,761 (+18.7%)
Mediatek MT6833V/NZA vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,600 (+13.6%)
QTI SM6225 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,542 (+11.8%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM845 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,358 (+6.0%)
MT6833GP vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,238 (+2.2%)
QTI SM611 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,180 (+0.4%)
Mediatek MT6768 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
 3,104 (-2.0%)