Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 @ 2.80GHz is newer than Intel Core2 Duo T7700 @ 2.40GHz and is around 19% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 @ 2.80GHz is around 13% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 @ 2.80GHz uses around 23% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 464 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Core2 Duo T7700 @ 2.40GHz | ×Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 @ 2.80GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | BGA479 | PGA478 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 4.0MB, | L1: 128KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
| TDP | 35W | 44W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $6.39 | $8.03 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2008 | Q1 2009 | |
| # of Samples | 420 | 44 | |
| CPU Rank | 4557 | 4352 | |
| CPU Value | 7.3 | 7.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 9663(-11.6%) | 1093(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 944(-15.9%) | 1121(0.0%) |
| Intel Core2 Duo T7700 @ 2.40GHz | 944 | |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 @ 2.80GHz | 1,121 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo T7700 @ 2.40GHz | 7.3 | |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 @ 2.80GHz | 7.0 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo T7700 @ 2.40GHz | 966 | |
| Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 @ 2.80GHz | 1,093 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Core2 Duo T7700 @ 2.40GHz | Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 @ 2.80GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 35W | 44W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |