Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2687W @ 3.10GHz and is around -37% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz is around -20% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2687W @ 3.10GHz uses around 45% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 504 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2687W @ 3.10GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA2011 | LGA2011 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.0 GHz | Up to 3.8 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
| Cache | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 15MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 20MB | |
| TDP | 95W | 150W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $27.38 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2012 | Q1 2012 | |
| # of Samples | 271 | 233 | |
| CPU Rank | 2107 | 1588 | |
| CPU Value | 48.5 | 47.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1342(-19.6%) | 1669(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 6297(-37.2%) | 10030(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | 6,297 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2687W @ 3.10GHz | 10,030 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | 48.5 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2687W @ 3.10GHz | 47.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | 1,342 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2687W @ 3.10GHz | 1,669 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2640 @ 2.50GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2687W @ 3.10GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 95W | 150W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |