Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz is newer than Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz and is around -24% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz is around -11% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 195 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | ×Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA1366 | LGA1155 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 3.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 3.3 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 4 (Threads: 8) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
| Cache | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 12MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
| TDP | 130W | 45W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $23.73 | $8.21 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2011 | Q3 2011 | |
| # of Samples | 145 | 50 | |
| CPU Rank | 2286 | 2596 | |
| CPU Value | 28.4 | 15.1 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1643(0.0%) | 1455(-11.4%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 5386(0.0%) | 4076(-24.3%) |
| Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | 5,386 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | 4,076 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | 28.4 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | 15.1 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | 1,643 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | 1,455 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon X5687 @ 3.60GHz | Intel Xeon E3-1260L @ 2.40GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 130W | 45W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |