Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron E1600 @ 2.40GHz is newer than AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ and is around -11% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Celeron E1600 @ 2.40GHz is around -13% slower in single-thread testing. Also, AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1079 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Celeron E1600 @ 2.40GHz | ×AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA775 | AM2 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 2.4 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 0.5MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | |
| TDP | 65W | 89W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $16.24 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2009 | Q4 2008 | |
| # of Samples | 8 | 1071 | |
| CPU Rank | 4583 | 4465 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 24.5 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 9163(-12.6%) | 10493(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 840(-10.8%) | 942(0.0%) |
| Intel Celeron E1600 @ 2.40GHz | 840 | |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ | 942 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron E1600 @ 2.40GHz | NA | |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ | 24.5 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron E1600 @ 2.40GHz | 916 | |
| AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ | 1,049 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron E1600 @ 2.40GHz | AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 65W | 89W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |