Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz is newer than VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz and is around 12% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz is around 48% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 40 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | ×Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | BGA400 | FCBGA1170 | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 1.2 GHz | 2.0 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | NA2 | Not Supported | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (Threads: 2) | |
| Cache | L1: 128KB, L2: 1.0MB, | L1: 448KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 0MB | |
| TDP | NA2 | 7.5W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | NA | $1.28 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2013 | Q4 2013 | |
| # of Samples | 8 | 32 | |
| CPU Rank | 5164 | 5112 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 2.8 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 336(-32.3%) | 4963(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 353(-10.9%) | 396(0.0%) |
| VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | 353 | |
| Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | 396 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | NA | |
| Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | 2.8 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | 336 | |
| Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | 496 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz | Intel Celeron N2810 @ 2.00GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | NA | 7.5W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |