Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 @ 2.40GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz and is around -21% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 @ 2.40GHz is around -21% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 353 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 @ 2.40GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA2011 | LGA 2011 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.0 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 10 (Threads: 20) | |
| Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
| TDP | 130W | 95W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $23.73 | $17.34 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2013 | Q4 2013 | |
| # of Samples | 324 | 29 | |
| CPU Rank | 1344 | 1542 | |
| CPU Value | 66.9 | 76.5 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1860(0.0%) | 1472(-20.9%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 13316(0.0%) | 10560(-20.7%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | 13,316 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 10,560 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | 66.9 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 76.5 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | 1,860 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 @ 2.40GHz | 1,472 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2658 v2 @ 2.40GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 130W | 95W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |