Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz is around 32% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz uses around 42% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 825 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA 2011 | LGA2011-v3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.0 GHz | Up to 3.6 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 10 (Threads: 20) | 14 (Threads: 28) | |
| Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 2.5MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 896KB, L2: 3.5MB, L3: 35MB | |
| TDP | 95W | 145W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $17.34 | $26.46 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2014 | Q3 2014 | |
| # of Samples | 156 | 669 | |
| CPU Rank | 1556 | 1039 | |
| CPU Value | 79.6 | 0.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1490(-24.3%) | 1967(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 10349(-43.1%) | 18186(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz | 10,349 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz | 18,186 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz | 79.6 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz | NA | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz | 1,490 | |
| Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz | 1,967 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2 @ 2.20GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 95W | 145W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |