Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz, while Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz is around 23% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, but Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz is around 6% faster in single-thread testing. However, Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz uses around 17% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 279 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | ×Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$449.95 - BUY
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA2011-3 | FCLGA2011-3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 3.2 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.5 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 12 (Threads: 24) | |
Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 2.0MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 3.0MB, L3: 30MB | |
TDP | 135W | 160W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $24.64 | $29.20 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2016 | Q2 2016 | |
# of Samples | 209 | 70 | |
CPU Value | 30.7 | 24.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2182(0.0%) | 2055(-5.8%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 13812(-22.7%) | 17878(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | 13,812 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | 17,878 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | 30.7 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | 24.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | 2,182 | |
Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | 2,055 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 @ 3.20GHz | Intel Xeon E5-2687W v4 @ 3.00GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 135W | 160W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |