Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD PRO A12-9800 is newer than Intel Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz and is around -12% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD PRO A12-9800 is around 7% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Desktop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 676 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×AMD PRO A12-9800 | ×Intel Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | AM4 | LGA 1151 | |
| CPU Class | Desktop | Desktop | |
| Clockspeed | 3.8 GHz | 2.2 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 4.2 GHz | Up to 2.8 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 4 (in 4 physical modules) | 4 (Threads: 4) | |
| Cache | L1: 512KB, L2: 4.0MB, | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 6MB | |
| TDP | 65W | 35W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $11.86 | $6.39 | |
| Other | R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G | ||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2017 | Q4 2015 | |
| # of Samples | 35 | 641 | |
| CPU Rank | 2724 | 2574 | |
| CPU Value | 22.2 | 26.6 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1724(0.0%) | 1608(-6.7%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 3751(-11.8%) | 4254(0.0%) |
| AMD PRO A12-9800 | 3,751 | |
| Intel Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz | 4,254 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD PRO A12-9800 | 22.2 | |
| Intel Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz | 26.6 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD PRO A12-9800 | 1,724 | |
| Intel Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz | 1,608 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD PRO A12-9800 | Intel Core i5-6400T @ 2.20GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 65W | 35W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |