Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 @ 2.00GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz and is around -11% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 @ 2.00GHz is around -45% slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz uses around 42% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 453 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 @ 2.00GHz | ×Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | LGA2011-v3 | LGA1150 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 6 (Threads: 12) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
| Cache | L1: 384KB, L2: 1.5MB, L3: 15MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, L3: 8MB | |
| TDP | 52W | 80W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $9.49 | $14.60 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q1 2018 | Q2 2013 | |
| # of Samples | 2 | 451 | |
| CPU Rank | 2052 | 1894 | |
| CPU Value | 14.5 | 17.7 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1210(-44.7%) | 2190(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 6415(-11.5%) | 7246(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 @ 2.00GHz | 6,415 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz | 7,246 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 @ 2.00GHz | 14.5 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz | 17.7 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 @ 2.00GHz | 1,210 | |
| Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz | 2,190 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon E5-2608L v3 @ 2.00GHz | Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 @ 3.50GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 52W | 80W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |