Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 75F3 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz also around 44% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing, it is around 23% faster in single-thread testing. However, AMD EPYC 75F3 uses around 31% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class.The values below were tabulated from a combined 3 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 75F3 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
$4900 - BUY
![]() |
$3944.45 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 3.0 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.8 GHz | Up to 4.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 1,792KB, L2: 28.0MB, L3: 39MB | L1: 768KB, L2: 6.0MB, L3: 32MB | |
TDP | 205W | 280W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $51.10 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q1 2018 | Q2 2021 | |
# of Samples | 2 | 1 | |
CPU Value | 7.8 | 17.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2142(-22.8%) | 2775(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 38259(-44.2%) | 68505(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | 38,259 | |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | 68,505 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | 7.8 | |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | 17.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | 2,142 | |
AMD EPYC 75F3 | 2,775 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 75F3 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 280W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |