Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD A9-9425 is newer than Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz and is around 6% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD A9-9425 is around 28% faster in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Laptop CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1648 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | ×AMD A9-9425 | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCBGA1090 | BGA (FT4) | |
| CPU Class | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clockspeed | 1.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 2.6 GHz | Up to 3.7 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 2 (Threads: 2) | 2 (in 2 physical modules) | |
| Cache | L1: 112KB, L2: 4.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 2.0MB, | |
| TDP | 6W | 15W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $1.10 | $2.74 | |
| Other | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | RADEON R5, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G | |
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2018 | Q2 2018 | |
| # of Samples | 1084 | 564 | |
| CPU Rank | 4066 | 3999 | |
| CPU Value | 13.4 | 0.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 1035(-21.8%) | 1324(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 1430(-6.0%) | 1522(0.0%) |
| Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | 1,430 | |
| AMD A9-9425 | 1,522 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | 13.4 | |
| AMD A9-9425 | NA | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | 1,035 | |
| AMD A9-9425 | 1,324 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Celeron N4000 @ 1.10GHz | AMD A9-9425 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 6W | 15W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |