Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz is newer than Intel Xeon E3-1280 @ 3.50GHz and is around -11% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. However, it is significantly slower in single-thread testing. Also, Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 93 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | ×Intel Xeon E3-1280 @ 3.50GHz | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCBGA1310 | LGA1155 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.0 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Not Supported | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 12 (Threads: 12) | 4 (Threads: 8) | |
Cache | L1: 896KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 0MB | L1: 256KB, L2: 1.0MB, | |
TDP | 25W | 95W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $4.56 | $17.34 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q3 2018 | Q2 2011 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 90 | |
CPU Value | 15.2 | 11.4 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 702(-61.1%) | 1802(0.0%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 5040(-10.8%) | 5650(0.0%) |
Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | 5,040 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1280 @ 3.50GHz | 5,650 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | 15.2 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1280 @ 3.50GHz | 11.4 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | 702 | |
Intel Xeon E3-1280 @ 3.50GHz | 1,802 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Atom C3858 @ 2.00GHz | Intel Xeon E3-1280 @ 3.50GHz | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 25W | 95W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |