Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7F52 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M @ 3.00GHz and is significantly faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD EPYC 7F52 is around 19% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 28 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M @ 3.00GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7F52 | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | SP3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 3.0 GHz | 3.5 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.5 GHz | Up to 3.9 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 18 (Threads: 36) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 25MB | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | |
| TDP | NA2 | 240W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | NA | $43.80 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q4 2018 | Q2 2020 | |
| # of Samples | 10 | 18 | |
| CPU Rank | 689 | 326 | |
| CPU Value | 0.0 | 21.7 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2085(-16.3%) | 2491(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 24952(-39.4%) | 41202(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M @ 3.00GHz | 24,952 | |
| AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,202 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M @ 3.00GHz | NA | |
| AMD EPYC 7F52 | 21.7 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M @ 3.00GHz | 2,085 | |
| AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,491 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| Intel Xeon Platinum 8124M @ 3.00GHz | AMD EPYC 7F52 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | NA | 240W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |