Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Gold 6346 @ 3.10GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7F52 and is around -9% slower in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. However the CPUs have comparable single-thread rating. Also, AMD EPYC 7F52 uses around 16% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 58 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×AMD EPYC 7F52 | ×Intel Xeon Gold 6346 @ 3.10GHz | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
Search Online
|
Search Online
| |
| Socket Type | SP3 | FCLGA4189 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 3.5 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 3.6 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 16 (Threads: 32) | 16 (Threads: 32) | |
| Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 8.0MB, L3: 256MB | L1: 960KB, L2: 15.0MB, L3: 36MB | |
| TDP | 240W | 205W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $43.80 | $37.41 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q2 2020 | Q4 2021 | |
| # of Samples | 18 | 40 | |
| CPU Rank | 321 | 370 | |
| CPU Value | 21.7 | 17.0 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2491(-1.2%) | 2520(0.0%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 41202(0.0%) | 37344(-9.4%) |
| AMD EPYC 7F52 | 41,202 | |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6346 @ 3.10GHz | 37,344 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD EPYC 7F52 | 21.7 | |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6346 @ 3.10GHz | 17.0 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD EPYC 7F52 | 2,491 | |
| Intel Xeon Gold 6346 @ 3.10GHz | 2,520 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2026 |
| AMD EPYC 7F52 | Intel Xeon Gold 6346 @ 3.10GHz | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 240W | 205W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |