Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The AMD EPYC 7352 is newer than Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz and is around 19% faster in multi-threaded (CPU Mark) testing. The AMD EPYC 7352 is around -15% slower in single-thread testing. Both CPUs operates at simliar power levels (TDP). All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 14 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7352 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
$749.95 - BUY
![]() | |
Socket Type | LGA3647 | SP3 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.3 GHz | 2.3 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 3.9 GHz | Up to 3.2 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 24 (Threads: 48) | 24 (Threads: 48) | |
Cache | L1: 1,024KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 32MB | L1: 1,536KB, L2: 12.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 165W | 155W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $30.11 | $28.29 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q4 2020 | Q3 2021 | |
# of Samples | 3 | 11 | |
CPU Value | 4.4 | 53.8 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2315(0.0%) | 1979(-14.5%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 33970(-15.9%) | 40370(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | 33,970 | |
AMD EPYC 7352 | 40,370 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | 4.4 | |
AMD EPYC 7352 | 53.8 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | 2,315 | |
AMD EPYC 7352 | 1,979 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M @ 2.30GHz | AMD EPYC 7352 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 165W | 155W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |