Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7252 is around 19% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD EPYC 7252 uses around 13% more power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 16 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
| Compare List | |
| ×Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7252 | + ADD | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$894.45 - BUY
|
$286.95 - BUY
| |
| Socket Type | FCLGA4189 | SP3 | |
| CPU Class | Server | Server | |
| Clockspeed | 2.8 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Turbo Speed | Up to 3.6 GHz | Up to 3.2 GHz | |
| # of Physical Cores | 8 (Threads: 16) | 8 (Threads: 16) | |
| Cache | L1: 640KB, L2: 10.0MB, L3: 12MB | NA2 | |
| TDP | 105W | 120W | |
| Yearly Running Cost | $19.16 | $21.90 | |
| Other | |||
| First Seen on Chart | Q3 2021 | Q2 2021 | |
| # of Samples | 10 | 6 | |
| CPU Value | 20.9 | 67.6 | |
| Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2407(0.0%) | 2020(-16.1%) | |
| CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 18718(-3.6%) | 19411(0.0%) |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | 18,718 | |
| AMD EPYC 7252 | 19,411 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | 20.9 | |
| AMD EPYC 7252 | 67.6 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | 2,407 | |
| AMD EPYC 7252 | 2,020 | |
| PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
| Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y @ 2.80GHz | AMD EPYC 7252 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max TDP | 105W | 120W |
| Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per day | NA | NA |
| Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
| Running cost per year | NA | NA |