iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked

Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080 vs Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8150

The Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080 is newer than Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8150 is around 14% faster in single-thread testing. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Mobile/Embedded CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 1597 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.

  • The first section will show basic information for each CPU selected.
  • The additional graphs shows the CPU Mark and Single Thread values of each CPU selected.
  • An accompany graph, if price data is available, will shows the value for money, in terms of the CPU Mark/Thread Rating per dollar.
  • The last section will show approximate yearly running costs for the CPUs.

×Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080×Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8150+ ADD
Price Search Online Search Online
Socket TypeNA2NA2
CPU ClassMobile/EmbeddedMobile/Embedded
Clockspeed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Turbo SpeedNA2NA2
# of Physical Cores8 (Threads: 8)8 (Threads: 8)
CacheNA2NA2
TDPNA2NA2
Yearly Running CostNANA
Other
First Seen on ChartQ4 2021Q1 2021
# of Samples11596
CPU Rank23822430
CPU Value0.00.0
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group)2029(0.0%)1772(-12.6%)
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group)4846(0.0%)4625(-4.6%)
2 - Information not available. Do you know? Notify Us.

CPU Mark Rating
As of 23rd of January 2026 - Higher results represent better performance
Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
4,846
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8150
4,625
PassMark Software © 2008-2026
CPU Single Thread Rating
As of 23rd of January 2026 - Higher results represent better performance
Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
2,029
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8150
1,772
PassMark Software © 2008-2026
Estimated Energy Usage Cost
Estimated Energy Adjustable Values
Average hours of use per day Average CPU Utilization (0-100%)1 Power cost, $ per kWh2
8
25
1Average user usage is typically low and can vary from task to task. An estimate load 25% is nominal.
2Typical power costs vary around the world. Check your last power bill for details. Values of $0.15 to $0.45 per kWh are typical.
Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080 Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8150
Max TDPNANA
Power consumption per day (kWh)NANA
Running cost per dayNANA
Power consumption per year (kWh)NANA
Running cost per yearNANA
Shown CPU power usage is based on linear interpolation of Max TDP (i.e. max load). Actual CPU power profile may vary.