Over 1,000,000 CPUs benchmarked
The Intel Xeon W-3275 @ 2.50GHz is newer than AMD EPYC 7D12 is around 37% faster in single-thread testing. Also, AMD EPYC 7D12 uses substantially less power. All the CPUs in this comparison belong in the Server CPU Class. The values below were tabulated from a combined 25 benchmarks submitted from our PerformanceTest software and results and are updated daily to include new submissions.
Compare the performance of up to 5 different CPUs
Compare List | |
×Intel Xeon W-3275 @ 2.50GHz | ×AMD EPYC 7D12 | + ADD | |
---|---|---|---|
Price |
Search Online
![]() |
Search Online
![]() | |
Socket Type | FCLGA3647 | NA2 | |
CPU Class | Server | Server | |
Clockspeed | 2.5 GHz | 1.1 GHz | |
Turbo Speed | Up to 4.6 GHz | Up to 3.0 GHz | |
# of Physical Cores | 28 (Threads: 56) | 32 (Threads: 64) | |
Cache | L1: 1,792KB, L2: 28.0MB, L3: 39MB | L1: 2,048KB, L2: 16.0MB, L3: 128MB | |
TDP | 205W | 85W | |
Yearly Running Cost | $37.41 | $15.51 | |
Other | |||
First Seen on Chart | Q2 2023 | Q4 2022 | |
# of Samples | 7 | 18 | |
CPU Value | 8.5 | 0.0 | |
Single Thread Rating(% diff. to max in group) | 2606(0.0%) | 1899(-27.1%) | |
CPU Mark(% diff. to max in group) | 41469(-3.3%) | 42900(0.0%) |
Intel Xeon W-3275 @ 2.50GHz | 41,469 | |
AMD EPYC 7D12 | 42,900 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3275 @ 2.50GHz | 8.5 | |
AMD EPYC 7D12 | NA | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3275 @ 2.50GHz | 2,606 | |
AMD EPYC 7D12 | 1,899 | |
PassMark Software © 2008-2025 |
Intel Xeon W-3275 @ 2.50GHz | AMD EPYC 7D12 | |
---|---|---|
Max TDP | 205W | 85W |
Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per day | NA | NA |
Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA | NA |
Running cost per year | NA | NA |