Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked
Price and performance details for the Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.
Is the Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz Good for Gaming?
This is a fairly old CPU that is no longer competitive with newer CPUs. [More ...]
Description:
Class: Laptop
Socket:
Clockspeed: 2.3 GHz
Cores: 1 Threads: 1
Typical TDP: 35 W
Cache Size: L1: 64 KB, L2: 1.0 MB, L3: 0 MB
Other names: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 925 @ 2.30GHz
CPU First Seen on Charts: Q4 2010
CPUmark/$Price: NA
Overall Rank: 3577
Last Price Change: NA
Integer Math | 2,198 MOps/Sec |
---|---|
Floating Point Math | 1,132 MOps/Sec |
Find Prime Numbers | 3 Million Primes/Sec |
Random String Sorting | 1 Thousand Strings/Sec |
Data Encryption | 124.4 MBytes/Sec |
Data Compression | 10.2 MBytes/Sec |
Physics | 59 Frames/Sec |
Extended Instructions | 175 Million Matrices/Sec |
Single Thread | 910 MOps/Sec |
Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Processor | Average CPU Mark | |
---|---|---|
Apple M1 Max 10 Core 3200 MHz | 22,166 | |
Apple M1 Pro 10 Core 3200 MHz | 21,966 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 21,292 | |
Intel Core i7-11800H @ 2.30GHz | 21,042 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | 18,851 | |
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz | 14,273 | |
Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz | 12,169 | |
Intel Core i7-9750H @ 2.60GHz | 11,087 | |
Intel Core i7-8750H @ 2.20GHz | 10,024 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | 7,034 | |
Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz | 477 |
Processor | CPU Mark / $Price | |
---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-11800H @ 2.30GHz | 53.27 | |
Intel Core i7-8750H @ 2.20GHz | 25.38 | |
Intel Core i7-9750H @ 2.60GHz | 11.55 | |
Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz | NA | |
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz | NA | |
Apple M1 Max 10 Core 3200 MHz | NA | |
Apple M1 Pro 10 Core 3200 MHz | NA | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | NA | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | NA | |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | NA | |
Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz | NA |
Processor | Average Thread Rating | |
---|---|---|
Apple M1 Max 10 Core 3200 MHz | 3,848 | |
Apple M1 Pro 10 Core 3200 MHz | 3,827 | |
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz | 3,731 | |
Intel Core i7-11800H @ 2.30GHz | 3,117 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | 3,069 | |
Intel Core i7-10750H @ 2.60GHz | 2,693 | |
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H | 2,630 | |
Intel Core i7-9750H @ 2.60GHz | 2,466 | |
Intel Core i7-8750H @ 2.20GHz | 2,313 | |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U | 1,965 | |
Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz | 910 |
Baseline | CPU Mark | |
---|---|---|
BL1613969 - Aug 17 2022 | 510 | |
BL1613585 - Aug 16 2022 | 512 | |
BL1384792 - Mar 20 2021 | 454 |
Processor | Average CPU Mark | |
---|---|---|
Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz | 477 | |
AMD V140 vs Intel Celeron 925 | 379 (-20.6%) | |
AMD E-450 APU vs Intel Celeron 925 | 430 (-9.9%) | |
AMD E-350 vs Intel Celeron 925 | 418 (-12.4%) | |
AMD Turion 64 Mobile MK-38 vs Intel Celeron 925 | 362 (-24.1%) | |
AMD Athlon II Neo K345 Dual-Core vs Intel Celeron 925 | 527 (+10.5%) | |
AMD G-T56N vs Intel Celeron 925 | 485 (+1.5%) | |
AMD Athlon II Neo N36L Dual-Core vs Intel Celeron 925 | 478 (+0.1%) | |
AMD Turion 64 Mobile ML-42 vs Intel Celeron 925 | 400 (-16.2%) | |
Intel Celeron 900 @ 2.20GHz vs Intel Celeron 925 | 396 (-17.1%) | |
AMD Turion 64 Mobile ML-44 vs Intel Celeron 925 | 384 (-19.5%) | |
AMD V160 vs Intel Celeron 925 | 337 (-29.3%) | |
AMD V120 vs Intel Celeron 925 | 352 (-26.3%) |
Processor | Relative Gaming Score | |
---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-12900HK | 5,899 | |
Intel Core i9-12900H | 5,751 | |
Intel Core i9-12950HX | 5,623 | |
Intel Core i7-1370P | 5,618 | |
Intel Core i9-12900HX | 5,564 | |
Intel Core i7-12800H | 5,263 | |
Intel Core i7-12650H | 5,247 | |
Intel Core i7-12700H | 5,171 | |
Intel Core i7-12800HX | 4,826 | |
Intel Core i7-1280P | 4,807 | |
Intel Core i7-12850HX | 4,745 | |
Intel Core i5-1240U | 4,524 | |
Intel Celeron 925 @ 2.30GHz | 176 |