Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked
Benchmarks for the Intel Core i9-10900F can be found below. Release dates, price and performance comparisons are also listed when available. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.
Is the Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz Good for Gaming?
This is a fairly old CPU that is no longer competitive with newer CPUs. But this CPU contains 10 Cores and 20 Threads. The Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz also has reasonable threaded performance that will serve well in games. Paired with a good videocard, is this CPU Good for Gaming? Yes, this would be a suitable CPU for gaming. [More ...]
Description:
Class: Desktop
Socket: FCLGA1200
Clockspeed: 2.8 GHz
Turbo Speed: 5.2 GHz
Cores: 10 Threads: 20
Typical TDP: 65 W
Cache per CPU Package:
L1 Instruction Cache: 10 x 32 KB
L1 Data Cache: 10 x 32 KB
L2 Cache: 10 x 256 KB
L3 Cache: 20 MB
Memory Support: Max. Memory Size: 128 GB (DDR4-2933)
Other names: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10900F CPU @ 2.80GHz, Intel Core i9-10900F CPU @ 2.80GHz
CPU First Seen on Charts: Q3 2020
CPUmark/$Price: 47.05
Overall Rank:
950th fastest in multithreading out of 5812 CPUs
772nd fastest in single threading out of 5812 CPUs
307th fastest in out of 1557 Desktop CPUs
Last Price Change: $420.10 USD (2025-12-30)
| Integer Math | 79,956 MOps/Sec |
|---|---|
| Floating Point Math | 49,041 MOps/Sec |
| Find Prime Numbers | 57 Million Primes/Sec |
| Random String Sorting | 39,523 Thousand Strings/Sec |
| Data Encryption | 6,483 MBytes/Sec |
| Data Compression | 316,720 KBytes/Sec |
| Physics | 946 Frames/Sec |
| Extended Instructions | 20,214 Million Matrices/Sec |
| Single Thread | 3,031 MOps/Sec |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Processor | Average CPU Mark | |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 58,419 | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 58,257 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | 38,937 | |
| Apple M4 10 Core | 23,682 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 21,844 | |
| Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 19,766 | |
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 19,590 | |
| Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz | 18,075 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 17,677 | |
| Apple M2 8 Core 3500 MHz | 15,644 | |
| Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz | 14,130 |
| Processor | CPU Mark / $Price | |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 145.64 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | 134.70 | |
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 130.48 | |
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 124.56 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 117.85 | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 107.89 | |
| Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz | 60.54 | |
| Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 47.05 | |
| Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz | NA | |
| Apple M2 8 Core 3500 MHz | NA | |
| Apple M4 10 Core | NA |
| Processor | Average Thread Rating | |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-14900K | 4,693 | |
| Intel Core i9-13900K | 4,600 | |
| Apple M4 10 Core | 4,514 | |
| Apple M2 8 Core 3500 MHz | 3,886 | |
| Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz | 3,675 | |
| Intel Core i5-12400F | 3,489 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | 3,467 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | 3,365 | |
| Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 3,031 | |
| Intel Core i9-9900K @ 3.60GHz | 2,913 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | 2,560 |
| Baseline | CPU Mark | |
|---|---|---|
| BL3323567 - Mar 03 2026 | 21564 | |
| BL3321731 - Mar 02 2026 | 18909 | |
| BL3320442 - Mar 01 2026 | 18974 | |
| BL3320330 - Mar 01 2026 | 19696 | |
| BL3320191 - Mar 01 2026 | 16635 |
| Processor | Average CPU Mark | |
|---|---|---|
| Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 19,766 | |
| Intel Core i9-10900KF @ 3.70GHz vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 22,206 (+12.3%) | |
| Intel Core i9-10900 @ 2.80GHz vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 19,114 (-3.3%) | |
| Intel Core i7-10700K @ 3.80GHz vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 18,535 (-6.2%) | |
| Intel Xeon W-2255 @ 3.70GHz vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 22,575 (+14.2%) | |
| Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 24,547 (+24.2%) | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 22,746 (+15.1%) | |
| Intel Core i7-11700 @ 2.50GHz vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 20,644 (+4.4%) | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 4500 vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 16,005 (-19.0%) | |
| Intel Core i9-10850K @ 3.60GHz vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 21,916 (+10.9%) | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 32,500 (+64.4%) | |
| Intel Core i9-11900K @ 3.50GHz vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 24,950 (+26.2%) | |
| Intel Core i7-11700K @ 3.60GHz vs Intel Core i9-10900F | 24,345 (+23.2%) |
| Processor | Relative Gaming Score | |
|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D | 12,427 | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D | 12,123 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D | 11,263 | |
| Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus | 10,695 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D | 10,524 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | 10,388 | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | 10,374 | |
| Intel Core Ultra 9 290K Plus | 10,291 | |
| AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 10,257 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D | 10,172 | |
| AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D | 9,795 | |
| Intel Core Ultra 7 265K | 9,445 | |
| Intel Core i9-10900F @ 2.80GHz | 2,221 |