iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

MT6889Z/CZA

Price and performance details for the MT6889Z/CZA can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

MT6889Z/CZA

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.6 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: MT6889Z/CZA

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2021

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1488

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
4504

Single Thread Rating: 1798
Samples: 16*
*Margin for error: Medium

CPU Test Suite Average Results for MT6889Z/CZA

Integer Math28,251 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math12,175 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers14 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting12 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption1,604 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression81.2 MBytes/Sec
Physics362 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,277 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread1,798 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 31st of March 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for MT6889Z/CZA

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 31st of March 2023


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 31st of March 2023.

Search for MT6889Z/CZA
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 1st of April 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,199
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,656
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,518
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,683
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,410
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,354
MT6889Z/CZA
 4,504
Apple A11 Bionic
 4,355
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 4,076
AMD 3015Ce
 2,067
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 1,554
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 1st of April 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
 44.19
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 13.63
MT6889Z/CZA
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD 3015Ce
 NA
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Apple A11 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 1st of April 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,724
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,402
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,309
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,225
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,937
MT6889Z/CZA
 1,798
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,769
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 1,517
AMD 3015Ce
 1,341
Apple A11 Bionic
 1,281
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 820
Last 5 Baselines for MT6889Z/CZA
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8050329 - Oct 11 2022
6091
BL8050328 - Oct 11 2022
6091
BL8042604 - Jun 17 2022
2464
BL8036479 - Mar 27 2022
5529
BL8036478 - Mar 27 2022
5529
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for MT6889Z/CZA
As of 1st of April 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
MT6889Z/CZA
 4,504
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA vs MT6889Z/CZA
 5,621 (+24.8%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8150 vs MT6889Z/CZA
 4,543 (+0.9%)
Apple A13 Bionic vs MT6889Z/CZA
 5,354 (+18.9%)
Apple A12 Bionic vs MT6889Z/CZA
 4,834 (+7.3%)
Apple A11 Bionic vs MT6889Z/CZA
 4,355 (-3.3%)
Venus based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 vs MT6889Z/CZA
 5,380 (+19.5%)
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MT6889Z/CZA
 5,276 (+17.2%)
Hisilicon Kirin980 vs MT6889Z/CZA
 4,318 (-4.1%)
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MT6889Z/CZA
 3,788 (-15.9%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MT6889Z/CZA
 3,688 (-18.1%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs MT6889Z/CZA
 3,683 (-18.2%)
MT6853V/TNZA vs MT6889Z/CZA
 3,616 (-19.7%)