iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

MT6889Z/CZA

Price and performance details for the MT6889Z/CZA can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
MT6889Z/CZA

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.6 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: MT6889Z/CZA

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2021

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1806

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
4504

Single Thread Rating: 1798
Samples: 16*
*Margin for error: Medium

CPU Test Suite Average Results for MT6889Z/CZA

Integer Math28,251 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math12,175 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers14 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting12,164 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption1,604 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression83,182 KBytes/Sec
Physics362 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,277 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread1,798 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 18th of March 2024.

CPU Mark Distribution for MT6889Z/CZA

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 18th of March 2024


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 18th of March 2024.

Search for MT6889Z/CZA
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 19th of March 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
25,554
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
14,186
Intel Core i5-1235U
13,533
Apple A15 Bionic
9,898
Apple A14 Bionic
8,542
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
6,710
Apple A13 Bionic
5,654
Intel N100
5,585
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
5,368
MT6889Z/CZA
4,504
AMD 3015Ce
2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 19th of March 2024 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
43.80
Intel N100
43.63
MT6889Z/CZA
NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
NA
AMD 3015Ce
NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
NA
Apple A14 Bionic
NA
Apple A15 Bionic
NA
Apple A13 Bionic
NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 19th of March 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
3,705
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3,625
Apple A15 Bionic
3,611
Apple A14 Bionic
3,397
Intel Core i5-1235U
3,245
Apple A13 Bionic
2,311
Intel N100
1,963
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1,927
MT6889Z/CZA
1,798
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
1,767
AMD 3015Ce
1,341
Last 5 Baselines for MT6889Z/CZA
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8050329 - Oct 11 2022
6091
BL8050328 - Oct 11 2022
6091
BL8042604 - Jun 17 2022
2464
BL8036479 - Mar 27 2022
5529
BL8036478 - Mar 27 2022
5529
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for MT6889Z/CZA
As of 19th of March 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
MT6889Z/CZA
4,504
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs MT6889Z/CZA
5,449 (+21.0%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8150 vs MT6889Z/CZA
4,586 (+1.8%)
Apple A12 Bionic vs MT6889Z/CZA
4,941 (+9.7%)
Apple A11 Bionic vs MT6889Z/CZA
4,403 (-2.2%)
Venus based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 vs MT6889Z/CZA
5,398 (+19.9%)
Hisilicon Kirin980 vs MT6889Z/CZA
4,357 (-3.3%)
MT6833V/ZA vs MT6889Z/CZA
4,101 (-8.9%)
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MT6889Z/CZA
3,897 (-13.5%)
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs MT6889Z/CZA
3,809 (-15.4%)
MT6833 vs MT6889Z/CZA
3,784 (-16.0%)
Samsung Exynos 9810 vs MT6889Z/CZA
3,744 (-16.9%)
MediaTek MT6785V/CD vs MT6889Z/CZA
3,641 (-19.2%)