iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

QTI QCS8550

Price and performance details for the QTI QCS8550 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
QTI QCS8550

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 3.2 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: QTI QCS8550

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q4 2023

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1057

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
10369

Single Thread Rating: 3332
Samples: 4*
*Margin for error: High

CPU Test Suite Average Results for QTI QCS8550

Integer Math33,984 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math20,304 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers55 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting23,205 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption6,557 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression137,436 KBytes/Sec
Physics657 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions3,736 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread3,332 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 20th of May 2024.

CPU Mark Distribution for QTI QCS8550

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 16th of May 2024


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 16th of May 2024.

Search for QTI QCS8550
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 21st of May 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
25,423
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
14,185
Intel Core i5-1235U
13,463
QTI QCS8550
10,369
Apple A15 Bionic
9,898
Apple A14 Bionic
8,543
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
6,698
Apple A13 Bionic
5,684
Intel N100
5,557
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
5,378
AMD 3015Ce
2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 21st of May 2024 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
43.57
Intel N100
43.42
QTI QCS8550
NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
NA
AMD 3015Ce
NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
NA
Apple A14 Bionic
NA
Apple A15 Bionic
NA
Apple A13 Bionic
NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 21st of May 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
3,702
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3,635
Apple A15 Bionic
3,607
Apple A14 Bionic
3,396
QTI QCS8550
3,332
Intel Core i5-1235U
3,224
Apple A13 Bionic
2,320
Intel N100
1,959
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1,918
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
1,770
AMD 3015Ce
1,341
Last 4 Baselines for QTI QCS8550
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8079443 - Mar 07 2024
10819
BL8077446 - Jan 29 2024
10668
BL8075227 - Dec 22 2023
10386
BL8072096 - Oct 30 2023
9603
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for QTI QCS8550
As of 21st of May 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
QTI QCS8550
10,369
QTI SM8650 vs QTI QCS8550
11,616 (+12.0%)
QTI SM8550 vs QTI QCS8550
9,144 (-11.8%)
Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (MT6985) vs QTI QCS8550
8,159 (-21.3%)
Google Tensor G3 vs QTI QCS8550
8,134 (-21.6%)
Intel Core i3-13100E vs QTI QCS8550
11,650 (+12.4%)
Intel Core i3-11100HE @ 2.40GHz vs QTI QCS8550
11,289 (+8.9%)
Mediatek MT6989 vs QTI QCS8550
10,669 (+2.9%)
Samsung s5e9945 vs QTI QCS8550
10,482 (+1.1%)
Intel Core i3-N305 vs QTI QCS8550
10,100 (-2.6%)
Snapdragon 8 Gen2 Mobile Platform for Galaxy vs QTI QCS8550
9,362 (-9.7%)
Mediatek MT6983W/CZA vs QTI QCS8550
9,136 (-11.9%)
Mediatek MT8798Z/CNZA vs QTI QCS8550
9,110 (-12.1%)