iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

QTI SM6375

Price and performance details for the QTI SM6375 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
QTI SM6375

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.2 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: QTI SM6375

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q2 2023

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1800

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
4171

Single Thread Rating: 1871
Samples: 161*
*Margin for error: Low

CPU Test Suite Average Results for QTI SM6375

Integer Math22,866 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math7,737 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers10 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting12,223 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption2,769 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression62,276 KBytes/Sec
Physics203 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions1,513 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread1,871 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 29th of November 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for QTI SM6375

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 29th of November 2023
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 29th of November 2023.
For distribution graph only: Results are trimmed to exclude outliers by disregarding the bottom 1% and top 1% of submissions.

Search for QTI SM6375
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 29th of November 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
26,092
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
14,200
Intel Core i5-1235U
13,583
Apple A15 Bionic
9,882
Apple A14 Bionic
8,537
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
6,735
Intel N100
5,618
Apple A13 Bionic
5,601
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
5,382
QTI SM6375
4,171
AMD 3015Ce
2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 29th of November 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
43.96
Intel N100
43.89
QTI SM6375
NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
NA
AMD 3015Ce
NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
NA
Apple A14 Bionic
NA
Apple A15 Bionic
NA
Apple A13 Bionic
NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 29th of November 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
3,708
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3,698
Apple A15 Bionic
3,616
Apple A14 Bionic
3,400
Intel Core i5-1235U
3,278
Apple A13 Bionic
2,297
Intel N100
1,969
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1,924
QTI SM6375
1,871
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
1,768
AMD 3015Ce
1,341
Last 5 Baselines for QTI SM6375
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8073885 - Nov 27 2023
4245
BL8073884 - Nov 27 2023
4245
BL8073641 - Nov 24 2023
4351
BL8073633 - Nov 23 2023
4863
BL8073613 - Nov 23 2023
4121
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for QTI SM6375
As of 29th of November 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
QTI SM6375
4,171
Mediatek MT6877V/TTZA vs QTI SM6375
4,818 (+15.5%)
QTI SM7150 vs QTI SM6375
3,755 (-10.0%)
QTI SM6225 vs QTI SM6375
3,550 (-14.9%)
MT8188JV/A vs QTI SM6375
5,128 (+22.9%)
Mediatek MT6877V/ZA vs QTI SM6375
5,015 (+20.2%)
Mediatek MT6877 vs QTI SM6375
4,998 (+19.8%)
Mediatek MT6877V/TZA vs QTI SM6375
4,971 (+19.2%)
Samsung s5e8825 vs QTI SM6375
4,571 (+9.6%)
Mediatek MT8781V/NA vs QTI SM6375
4,561 (+9.4%)
Mediatek MT6855V/AZA vs QTI SM6375
4,529 (+8.6%)
Samsung s5e8535 vs QTI SM6375
4,455 (+6.8%)
QTI SM7225 vs QTI SM6375
4,347 (+4.2%)