iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

QTI SM7350

Price and performance details for the QTI SM7350 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

QTI SM7350

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.4 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: QTI SM7350

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q2 2023

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1590

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
5276

Single Thread Rating: 1785
Samples: 14*
*Margin for error: Medium

CPU Test Suite Average Results for QTI SM7350

Integer Math24,265 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math11,390 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers12 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting14,607 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption3,291 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression81,319 KBytes/Sec
Physics241 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,133 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread1,785 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 7th of December 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for QTI SM7350

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 4th of December 2023


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 4th of December 2023.

Search for QTI SM7350
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 8th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 26,041
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,198
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,577
Apple A15 Bionic
 9,883
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,538
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,735
Intel N100
 5,629
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,607
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,382
QTI SM7350
 5,276
AMD 3015Ce
 2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 8th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel N100
 43.97
Intel Core i5-1235U
 43.94
QTI SM7350
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD 3015Ce
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A15 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 8th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,708
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
 3,660
Apple A15 Bionic
 3,616
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,400
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,280
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,299
Intel N100
 1,970
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,924
QTI SM7350
 1,785
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,768
AMD 3015Ce
 1,341
Last 5 Baselines for QTI SM7350
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8069985 - Sep 29 2023
5431
BL8069509 - Sep 23 2023
5225
BL8068631 - Sep 09 2023
5574
BL8068630 - Sep 09 2023
5574
BL8068042 - Aug 29 2023
5405
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for QTI SM7350
As of 8th of December 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
QTI SM7350
 5,276
QTI SM8350 vs QTI SM7350
 6,491 (+23.0%)
QTI SM8250 vs QTI SM7350
 6,488 (+23.0%)
QTI SM8450 vs QTI SM7350
 6,308 (+19.6%)
QTI SM7325 vs QTI SM7350
 5,882 (+11.5%)
Mediatek MT6877V/TTZA vs QTI SM7350
 4,827 (-8.5%)
QTI SM6375 vs QTI SM7350
 4,181 (-20.8%)
Samsung s5e9925 vs QTI SM7350
 6,480 (+22.8%)
Mediatek MT6895Z/TCZA vs QTI SM7350
 6,359 (+20.5%)
Mediatek MT6893 vs QTI SM7350
 6,293 (+19.3%)
Samsung Exynos 990 vs QTI SM7350
 6,181 (+17.2%)
Samsung s5e8835 vs QTI SM7350
 6,103 (+15.7%)
Qualcomm SM7325 vs QTI SM7350
 5,994 (+13.6%)