iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Samsung "Exynos 9610"

Price and performance details for the Samsung "Exynos 9610" can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
Samsung "Exynos 9610"

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.2 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: Samsung "Exynos 9610"

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q1 2024

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 2235

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
3168

Single Thread Rating: 1012
Samples: 2*
*Margin for error: High

CPU Test Suite Average Results for Samsung "Exynos 9610"

Integer Math20,774 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math5,339 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers7 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting9,901 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption3,032 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression48,824 KBytes/Sec
Physics184 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions885 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread1,012 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 24th of April 2024.

CPU Mark Distribution for Samsung "Exynos 9610"

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 21st of April 2024


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 21st of April 2024.

Search for Samsung "Exynos 9610"
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 24th of April 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
25,454
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
14,184
Intel Core i5-1235U
13,482
Apple A15 Bionic
9,901
Apple A14 Bionic
8,543
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
6,713
Apple A13 Bionic
5,676
Intel N100
5,556
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
5,384
Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,168
AMD 3015Ce
2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 24th of April 2024 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
43.63
Intel N100
43.41
Samsung "Exynos 9610"
NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
NA
AMD 3015Ce
NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
NA
Apple A14 Bionic
NA
Apple A15 Bionic
NA
Apple A13 Bionic
NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 24th of April 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
3,704
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3,630
Apple A15 Bionic
3,610
Apple A14 Bionic
3,396
Intel Core i5-1235U
3,231
Apple A13 Bionic
2,318
Intel N100
1,961
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1,929
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
1,770
AMD 3015Ce
1,341
Samsung "Exynos 9610"
1,012
Last 2 Baselines for Samsung "Exynos 9610"
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8076390 - Jan 11 2024
3168
BL8076389 - Jan 11 2024
3168
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for Samsung "Exynos 9610"
As of 24th of April 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,168
QTI SM4450 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,928 (+24.0%)
Qualcomm SDM670 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,244 (+2.4%)
Mediatek MT8789V/CT vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,946 (+24.6%)
QTI SM7125 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,854 (+21.7%)
QTI SM7150 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,769 (+19.0%)
Mediatek MT6785 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,701 (+16.8%)
Mediatek MT6833V/NZA vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,602 (+13.7%)
QTI SM6225 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,546 (+11.9%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM845 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,351 (+5.8%)
MT6833GP vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,238 (+2.2%)
QTI SM611 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,180 (+0.4%)
Mediatek MT6769 vs Samsung "Exynos 9610"
3,113 (-1.7%)