iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

T700-Unisoc

Price and performance details for the T700-Unisoc can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.
T700-Unisoc

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 1.8 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: T700-Unisoc

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q4 2021

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 2555

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
2367

Single Thread Rating: 999
Samples: 20*
*Margin for error: Medium

CPU Test Suite Average Results for T700-Unisoc

Integer Math19,781 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math4,717 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers6 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting7,571 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption1,812 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression48,726 KBytes/Sec
Physics155 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions650 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread999 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 21st of February 2024.

CPU Mark Distribution for T700-Unisoc

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 16th of February 2024
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 16th of February 2024.
For distribution graph only: Results are trimmed to exclude outliers by disregarding the bottom 1% and top 1% of submissions.

Search for T700-Unisoc
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 21st of February 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
25,561
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
14,186
Intel Core i5-1235U
13,568
Apple A15 Bionic
9,897
Apple A14 Bionic
8,539
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
6,710
Apple A13 Bionic
5,642
Intel N100
5,623
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
5,372
T700-Unisoc
2,367
AMD 3015Ce
2,094
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 21st of February 2024 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel N100
43.93
Intel Core i5-1235U
43.91
T700-Unisoc
NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
NA
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
NA
AMD 3015Ce
NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
NA
Apple A14 Bionic
NA
Apple A15 Bionic
NA
Apple A13 Bionic
NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 21st of February 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
3,705
Apple A15 Bionic
3,613
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
3,595
Apple A14 Bionic
3,398
Intel Core i5-1235U
3,265
Apple A13 Bionic
2,308
Intel N100
1,963
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1,922
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
1,767
AMD 3015Ce
1,341
T700-Unisoc
999
Last 5 Baselines for T700-Unisoc
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8068498 - Sep 06 2023
2931
BL8063650 - Jun 08 2023
1619
BL8063649 - Jun 08 2023
1619
BL8062369 - May 16 2023
3038
BL8060871 - Apr 20 2023
2931
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for T700-Unisoc
As of 21st of February 2024 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
T700-Unisoc
2,367
MT6769V/CZ vs T700-Unisoc
2,767 (+16.9%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM6225 vs T700-Unisoc
2,692 (+13.7%)
Unisoc T610 vs T700-Unisoc
2,819 (+19.1%)
T618 vs T700-Unisoc
2,760 (+16.6%)
MT6769H vs T700-Unisoc
2,696 (+13.9%)
Unisoc ums512 vs T700-Unisoc
2,603 (+10.0%)
Unisoc T700 vs T700-Unisoc
2,579 (+9.0%)
T610-Unisoc vs T700-Unisoc
2,538 (+7.2%)
MT6771V/WL vs T700-Unisoc
2,334 (-1.4%)
Unisoc ums9230 vs T700-Unisoc
2,313 (-2.3%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM662 vs T700-Unisoc
2,237 (-5.5%)
MT6765H vs T700-Unisoc
2,132 (-9.9%)