iconcharts
0

CPU Benchmarks

Over 1,000,000 CPUs Benchmarked

Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080

Price and performance details for the Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080 can be found below. This is made using thousands of PerformanceTest benchmark results and is updated daily.

  • The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark.
  • The 2nd graph shows the value for money, in terms of the CPUMark per dollar.
  • The pricing history data shows the price for a single Processor. For multiple Processors, multiply the price shown by the number of CPUs.

Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080

Description:

Class: Mobile/Embedded

Socket:

Clockspeed: 2.8 GHz

Cores: 8 Threads: 8

Other names: Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080

CPU First Seen on Charts: Q4 2021

CPUmark/$Price: NA

Overall Rank: 1391

Last Price Change: NA

Average CPU Mark
rating
4846

Single Thread Rating: 2029
Samples: 1*
*Margin for error: High

CPU Test Suite Average Results for Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080

Integer Math35,815 MOps/Sec
Floating Point Math14,413 MOps/Sec
Find Prime Numbers21 Million Primes/Sec
Random String Sorting15 Thousand Strings/Sec
Data Encryption932.3 MBytes/Sec
Data Compression94.5 MBytes/Sec
Physics416 Frames/Sec
Extended Instructions2,486 Million Matrices/Sec
Single Thread2,029 MOps/Sec
From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 1st of February 2023.

CPU Mark Distribution for Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080

Submitted Baseline Distribution Graph as of 28th of January 2023


Not Enough Data from Current Version of PerformanceTest to Create Distribution Graph.

From submitted results to PerformanceTest V10 as of 28th of January 2023.

Search for Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
from the Featured Merchants below:
Amazon.com
Newegg.com
bestbuy.com
EBay.com
Note: PassMark Software may earn compensation for sales from links on this site through affiliate programs.
CPU Mark Relative to Top 10 Common Mobile/Embedded CPUs
As of 2nd of February 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 14,268
Intel Core i5-1235U
 13,644
Apple A14 Bionic
 8,524
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 6,708
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 5,434
Apple A13 Bionic
 5,326
Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 4,846
Apple A11 Bionic
 4,341
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 4,098
AMD 3015Ce
 2,088
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 1,554
CPU Value (CPU Mark / $Price )
As of 2nd of February 2023 - Higher results represent better value
Processor CPU Mark / $Price
Intel Core i5-1235U
 44.15
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 13.71
Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 NA
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 NA
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 NA
AMD 3015Ce
 NA
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 NA
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 NA
Apple A14 Bionic
 NA
Apple A13 Bionic
 NA
Apple A11 Bionic
 NA
Single Thread Rating
As of 2nd of February 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average Thread Rating
Apple M1 8 Core 3200 MHz
 3,730
Apple A14 Bionic
 3,406
Intel Core i5-1235U
 3,310
Apple A13 Bionic
 2,213
Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 2,029
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B
 1,929
Intel Pentium Silver N6005 @ 2.00GHz
 1,769
Intel Celeron N5105 @ 2.00GHz
 1,521
AMD 3015Ce
 1,340
Apple A11 Bionic
 1,272
AMD Embedded G-Series GX-420GI Radeon R7E
 822
Last 1 Baselines for Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
Most recent listed first
Baseline CPU Mark
BL8020493 - Oct 02 2021
4846
Additional baselines can be obtained using Windows version of PerformanceTest's Manage Baselines feature.
Popular comparisons for Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
As of 2nd of February 2023 - Higher results represent better performance
Processor Average CPU Mark
Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 4,846
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc KONA vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,599 (+15.5%)
vendor Kirin980 vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,358 (+10.6%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8150 vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 4,510 (-6.9%)
MT6893Z_A/CZA vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 6,029 (+24.4%)
vendor Kirin990 vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,878 (+21.3%)
MT6891 vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,791 (+19.5%)
MT6893Z_D/CZA vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,701 (+17.6%)
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SDM778G vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,542 (+14.4%)
lisa based Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. SM7325 vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,476 (+13.0%)
Apple A13 Bionic vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,326 (+9.9%)
Haydn based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,325 (+9.9%)
Vili based on Qualcomm Technologies, Inc SM8350 vs Samsung Technologies, Inc Exynos E1080
 5,299 (+9.3%)